書籍詳細

未契約

書籍名	Urologic Surgery Next No.2 ロボット支援手術
出版社	メジカルビュー社
発行日	2018-04-01
著者	荒井陽一(編集委員) 高橋悟(編集委員) 山本新吾(編集委員) 土谷順彦(編集委員) 土谷順彦(担当編集委員)
ISBN	9784758313315
ページ数	196
版刷巻号	第1版第1刷
分野	臨床医学：外科泌尿器科学
シリーズ	Urologic Surgery Next
閲覧制限	未契約

近年めざましい進歩を遂げた泌尿器科手術の最前線を、第一線で活躍するエキスパートがオールカラーの豊富な写真・イラストとともにわかりやすく解説した『Urologic Surgery Next』シリーズ。No.2のテーマは「ロボット支援手術」。外科領域で最もロボット手術が施行されているのが泌尿器科である。現在、前立腺全摘除術（RARP）、腎部分切除術（RAPN）、膀胱全摘除術がロボット手術で行われており、泌尿器科のロボット手術は今後ますますその適応を拡大していくと考えられる。ロボット手術の手技習得が不可欠である泌尿器科臨床医にとって、必携の一冊。

表紙
閲覧
「Urologic Surgery Next」シリーズ刊行にあたって
閲覧
序文
閲覧
執筆者一覧
閲覧
目次
閲覧
(I) 前立腺の手術
P.1閲覧
- RARPに必要な外科解剖
- 経腹的アプローチによるRARP
- 後腹膜アプローチによるRARP
- 確実な膀胱頸部処理の工夫
- ナビゲーションによるRARP
- RARP術後の尿禁制改善のための術式の工夫
- RARPにおけるtotal pelvic reconstructionのコンセプトと実際 ( 尿路再建法としてのtotal pelvic reconstruction )
- 局所進行癌に対するRARP
- 骨盤内リンパ節郭清
(II) 腎の手術
P.101閲覧
- 経腹膜到達法によるロボット腎部分切除術 ( 動脈全阻血法 )
- 腹膜外到達法による腎部分切除術
- 選択的腎動脈クランプ法による腎部分切除術
- 腎盂形成術
(III) 膀胱の手術と尿路再建術
P.135閲覧
- 膀胱全摘除術 ( 男性 )
- 女性における膀胱全摘除術
- 拡大リンパ節郭清
- 回腸導管
- 新膀胱造設術
(IV) ロボット支援手術のトラブルシューティング
P.177閲覧
奥付
閲覧

参考文献

(I) 前立腺の手術

P.11 掲載の参考文献

1) Takenaka A, et al:Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy:Anatomic basis and preliminary out-comes. Eur Urol 2007;51:433-40.

2) Tewari AK, et al:Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and Preservation of puboprostatic collar:a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:726-31.

3) Hinata N, et al:Bladder neck muscle degeneration in patients with prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2016;195:206-12.
pubmed

4) Nyarangi-Dix J, et al:Impact of complete bladder neck preservation on urinary continence, quality of life and surgical margins after radical prostatectomy:A randomized, controlled, single blind trial. J Urol 2013;189:891-8.

5) Takenaka A, et al:Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004;172:1032-5.
pubmed

6) Tewari AK, et al:Anatomical grades of nerve sparing:a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011;108:984-92.
pubmed

7) Patel VR, et al:The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;61:571-6.
pubmed

8) Lindsey I, et al:Anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br J Surg 2000;87:1288-99.
pubmed

9) Muraoka K, et al:Site-dependent and interindividual variations in Denonvilliers' fascia:a histological study using donated elderly male cadavers. BMC Urol 2015;15:42.
pubmed

10) Soga H, et al:Topographical relationship between urethral rhabdosphincter and rectourethralis muscle:a better understanding of the apical dissection and posterior stitches in radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2008;15:729-32.
pubmed

P.27 掲載の参考文献

1) Eichelberg A, Erbersdobler A, et al:Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 2007;51:110-8.

2) Rocco B, Gregori A, et al:Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:996-1003.
pubmed

3) Patel VR, Coelho RF, et al:Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009;56:472-8.
pubmed

4) Tewari AK, Bigelow K, et al:Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar:a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:726-31.

5) EAU-Guidelines-Prostate-Cancer:https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Prostate-Cancer-2016.pdf

6) Ploussard G, Briganti A, et al:Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:efficacy, limitation, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2014;65:7-16.
pubmed

P.33 掲載の参考文献

1) 戸澤啓一, 安井孝周, ほか:前立腺癌の治療と問題点《前立腺全摘除術》ロボット支援腹腔鏡下前立腺全摘除術の実際と問題点. 臨泌 2014;68:139-43.

2) 安井孝周, 戸澤啓一, ほか:日本人患者150人における精嚢への後方アプローチによるロボット支援腹腔鏡前立腺摘除術の成績. Nagoya Medical Journal 2013;53:11-25.

3) 戸澤啓一, 安井孝周, ほか:【ロボット支援下手術の現況と未来展望】ロボット支援下前立腺全摘除術後方アプローチ. 泌尿器外科 2013;26巻4:409-13.

4) 戸澤啓一, 河合憲康, ほか:【前立腺がんの手術】ロボット支援手術について多数例の成績開腹手術,腹腔鏡手術との比較も含めて. Prostate Journal 2014;1:9-13.

P.48 掲載の参考文献

1) Hinata N, Miyake H, et al;Bladder Neck Muscle Degeneration in Patients with Prostatic Hyperplasia. The Journal of urology 2016;195(1):206-12.
pubmed

2) Walz J, Burnett AL, et al:A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. European urology 2010;57(2):179-92.
pubmed

3) Myers RP:Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane:relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy-anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology 2002;59(4):472-9.
pubmed

4) Freire MP, Weinberg, et al:Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:description of technique and outcomes. European urology 2009;56(6):972-80.
pubmed

5) Tewari A, El-Hakim A, et al:Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU international 2006;98(4):829-32.
pubmed

6) Friedlander DF, Alemozaffar M, et al:Stepwise description and outcomes of bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Journal of urology 2012;188(5):1754-60.
pubmed

7) Huang AC, Kowalczyk KJ, et al:The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy:technique and outcomes. European urology 2011;59(4):595-603.
pubmed

8) Ma X, Tang K, et al:Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2016;7(41):67463-75.
pubmed

9) Myers RP:Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. The Urologic clinics of North America 2001;28(3):473-90.
pubmed

P.60 掲載の参考文献

1) Ukimura O, Troncoso P, et al:Prostate cancer staging:correlation beween ultrasound determined tumor contact length and pathologically confirmed extraprostatic extension. J Urol 1998;159(4):1251-9.

2) Baco E, Rud E, et al:Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging determined tumor contact length for extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. J Urol 2015;193(2):466-72.
pubmed

3) Ukimura O, Gill IS, et al:Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004;172(1):112-8.
pubmed

4) Ukimura O, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al:Real-time transrectal ultrasoundguidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:impact on surgical margins. J Urol 2006;175(4):1304-10.

5) Ukimura O, Gill IS:Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:pictorial essay. J Urol 2006;175(4):1311-9.
pubmed

6) Baco E, Ukimura O, et al:Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor:correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients. Eur Urol 2015:67(4):787-94.
pubmed

7) Ukimura O, Marien A, et al:Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies. World J Urol 2015:33(11):1669-76.
pubmed

8) Matsugasumi T, Baco E, et al:Prostate Cancer Volume Estimation by Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy Proven Cancer Core Length:Correlation with Cancer Volume. J Urol 2015;194(4):957-65.
pubmed

9) Shin T, Ukimura O, et al:Three-dimensional Printed Model of Prostate Anatomy and Targeted Biopsy-proven Index Tumor to Facilitate Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016;69(2):377-9.
pubmed

10) Long JA, Lee BH, et al:Real-time Robotic Transrectal Ultrasound Navigation During Robotic Radocal Prostatectomy:Initial Clinical Experience. Urology 2012;80(3):608-13.
pubmed

11) Hung AJ, Abreu AL, et al:Robotic transrectal ultrasonography during robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(2):341-8.
pubmed

12) Han M, Kim C, et al:Tandem-robotAssisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy to Improve the Neurovascular Bundle Visualization:A Feasibility Study. Urology 2011;77(2):502-6.
pubmed

13) Shoji S, Aron M, et al:Intraoperative ultrasonography with a surgeon-manipulated microtransducer during robotic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2014;21(7):736-9.
pubmed

P.70 掲載の参考文献

1) Kojima Y, Takahashi N, et al:Urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:pathophysiology and intraoperative techniques to improve surgical outcome. Int J Urol 2013;20:1052-63.
pubmed

2) Rocco F, Carmignani L, et al:Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol 2007;52:376-83.
pubmed

3) Ogawa S, Hoshi S, et al:Three-layer Two-step Posterior Reconstruction using Peritoneum during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy to Improve Recovery of Urinary Continence-Prospective comparative study. J Endourol 2017;31:1251-7.
pubmed

4) Student V Jr, Vidlar A, et al:Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support(ARVUS)during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:One-year functional outcomes in a two-group randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2017;71:822-30.

5) Walsh PC:Anatomic radical prostatectomy:evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998;160:2418-24.
pubmed

6) Patel VR, Coelho RF, et al:Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:description of the technique and continence outocomes. Eur Urol 2009;56:472-8.

7) Tewari AK, Bigelow K, et al:Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar:a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:726-31.

8) Kojima Y, Hamakawa T, et al:Bladder neck sling suspension during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early return of urinary continence:a comparative analysis. Urology 2014;83:632-9.
pubmed

9) Walsh PC, Marschke PL:Intussusception of the reconstructed bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002;59:934-8.
pubmed

10) Lee DI, Wedmid A, et al:Bladder neck plication stitch:a novel technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve recovery of urinary continence. J Endourol 2011;25:1873-7.
pubmed

P.81 掲載の参考文献

1) Montorsi F, Wilson TG, et al:Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 2012;62:368-81.

2) Ficarra V, Novara G, et al:Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:405-17.

3) Freire MP, Weinberg AC, et al:Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2009;56:972-80.
pubmed

4) Takenaka A, Tewari AK, et al:Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy:anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes. Eur Urol 2007;51:433-40.
pubmed

5) Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, et al:Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(RALP):the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol 2010;58:407-17.
pubmed

6) Rocco B, Cozzi G, et al:Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy:a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;62:779-90.
pubmed

7) Grasso AA, Patel VR, et al:Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy:an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2016;118:20-34.

8) Tewari AK, Ali A, et al:Improving time to continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy:augmentation of the total anatomic reconstruction technique by adding dynamic detrusor cuff trigonoplasty and suprapubic tube placement. J Endourol 2012;26:1546-52.
pubmed

P.91 掲載の参考文献

1) 藤元博行:前立腺全摘除術. 新癌の外科-手術手技シリーズ泌尿器癌. メジカルビュー社, 2001, p100-7.

2) Rocco F, Carmignani L, et al:Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol 2007;52:376-83.
pubmed

P.99 掲載の参考文献

1) 日本泌尿器科学会編(2016):前立腺癌診療ガイドライン2016年版. メディカルレビュー社, 大阪, 2016,p118-20.

2) 吉川公彦, 坂口昇二, ほか:ステント, ステントグラフトに必要な情報. 日獨医報 2006;51:141-3.

(II) 腎の手術

P.111 掲載の参考文献

1) Kondo T, Takagi T, et al:Early unclamping might reduce the risk of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2015;22:1096-102.
pubmed

P.119 掲載の参考文献

1) Ghani KR, Porter J, et al:Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy:a step-by-step guide. BJU Int 2014;114:311-3.
pubmed

2) Kondo T, Takagi T, et al:Early unclamping might reduce the risk of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2015;22:1096-102.
pubmed

P.127 掲載の参考文献

1) Hung AJ, Cai J, et al:"Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy. J urol 2013;189:36-42.
pubmed

2) Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, et al:"Zero ischemia" partial nephrectomy:novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 2011;59:128-34.
pubmed

3) Furukawa J, Miyake H, et al:Console-integrated real-time three-dimensional image overlay navigation for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective arterial clamping:early single-centre experience with 17 cases. Int J Med Robot 2014;10:385-90.
pubmed

4) Abreu AL, Gill IS, et al:Zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy(RPN)for hilar tumours. BJU Int 2011;108:948-54.
pubmed

5) Furukawa J, Miyake H, et al:Renal Functional and Perioperative Outcomes of Selective Versus Complete Renal Arterial Clamping During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy:Early Single-Center Experience With 39 Cases. Surg Innov 2016;23:242-8.
pubmed

6) Komninos C, Shin TY, et al:T Renal function is the same 6 months after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy regardless of clamp technique:analysis of outcomes for off-clamp, selective arterial clamp and main artery clamp techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. BJU Int 2015;115:921-8.

7) Yezdani M, Yu SJ, et al:Selective Arterial Clamping Versus Hilar Clamping for Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2016;17:40.
pubmed

8) Rosset A, Spadola L, et al:OsiriX:an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:205-16.
pubmed

P.133 掲載の参考文献

1) Monn MF, Bahler CD, et al:Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. J Urol 2013;189:1352-7.
pubmed

2) Varda BK, Johnson EK, et al:National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol 2014;191:1090-5.
pubmed

3) Autorino R, Eden C, et al:Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2014;65:430-52.
pubmed

(III) 膀胱の手術と尿路再建術

P.145 掲載の参考文献

1) Menon M, Hemal AK, et al:Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003;92:232-6.
pubmed

2) Yuh B, Wilson T, et al:Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:402-22.
pubmed

3) Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, et al:Enhanced recovery after surgery:a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005;24:466-77.
pubmed

4) Oshima T, Takesue Y, et al:Preoperative oral antibiotics and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis reduce the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing IPAA. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:1149-55.
pubmed

P.162 掲載の参考文献

1) Bruins HM, Veskimae E, et al:The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer:a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014;66:1065-77.
pubmed

2) 鶴田大, 羽渕友則:ロボット支援腹腔鏡下膀胱全摘術における拡大リンパ節郭清の手技と成績. Japanese Journal of Endourology 2017;30:14-9.
Medical*Online

3) 土谷順彦, 鶴田大, ほか:膀胱癌に対するロボット支援膀胱全摘除術リンパ節郭清. 臨床泌尿器科 2015;69:918-23.

4) Li K, Lin T, et al:Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy. Cancer Treat Rev 2013;39:551-60.

5) Tang K, Xia D, et al:Robotic vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:1399-411.
pubmed

P.170 掲載の参考文献

1) Hayn MH, Hussain A, et al:The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy:results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 2010;58:197-202.
pubmed

2) Kader AK, Richards KA, et al:Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy:comparison of complications and perioperative oncological outcomes in 200 patients. BJU Int 2013;112:E290-4.
pubmed

3) Yuh B, Wilson T, et al:Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot- assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:402-22.
pubmed

4) Azhar RA, Bochner B, et al:Enhanced recovery after urological surgery:a contemporary systematic review of outcomes, key elements, and research needs.Eur Urol 2016;70:17

(IV) ロボット支援手術のトラブルシューティング

P.185 掲載の参考文献

1) Kim WT, Ham WK, et al:Failure and malfunction of da Vinci Surgical Systems during various robotic surgeries:experience from six departments at a single institute. Urology 2009;74:1234-7.

2) Chen CC, Ou YC, et al:Malfunction of the da Vinci robotic system in urology. Int J Urol 2012;19:736-40.

はじめての方へ

個人／法人会員登録のご案内