~
検索条件をクリア

アブストラクト

Title 第1回 SIRSとqSOFAの意義
Subtitle 連載 Sepsis-3を検証する
Authors 丸藤哲
Authors (kana)
Organization 札幌東徳洲会病院 救急集中センター
Journal Thrombosis Medicine
Volume 11
Number 1
Page 71-76
Year/Month 2021 / 3
Article 報告
Publisher 先端医学社
Abstract 「Points」[1]敗血症(sepsis)の診断基準は, Sepsis-1, Sepsis-2, Sepsis-3と変遷してきたが, 2016年に公表されたSepsis-3の妥当性に関して多くの論文が公表されている. [2]Sepsis-1/Sepsis-2のsepsis診断指標であるsystemic inflammatory response syndrome(SIRS)とSepsis-3で提唱された予後予測指標であるquick sequential organ failure assessment(qSOFA)が争点となっている. [3]感染症疑い患者の病院死亡を含む予後をSIRSは高感度/低特異度で, qSOFAは低感度/中等度〜高特異度で予測可能である. [4]SIRS/qSOFAの診断・予後予測指標としての意義と相違を理解し, 両者の診断特性を知悉した臨床応用が必要である. 「はじめに」1992年に敗血症(sepsis)の定義および診断基準を統一し, 共通の病態・背景因子を持つ患者を拾い上げて敗血症研究および治療の標準化を目指すことを目的に新たな敗血症の定義が公表された.
Practice 臨床医学:内科系
Keywords sepsis, SIRS, qSOFA, SOFA
  • 全文ダウンロード: 従量制、基本料金制の方共に935円(税込) です。

参考文献

残りの12件を表示する
  • 6) Jiang J et al: Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusci and Emerg Med 26:56, 2018
  • 7) Serafim R et al: A comparison of the quick-SOFA and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of mortality. Chest 153:646-655, 2018
  • 8) Song JU et al: Performance of the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment score as a prognostic too in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 22:28, 2018
  • 9) Maitra S et al: Accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Clin Microb Infect 24:1123-1129, 2018
  • 10) Tan TL et al: Comparison of prognostic accuracy of the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment between short- & long-term mortality in patients presenting outside of the Intensive Care Unit - A systematic review & meta-analysis. Sci Rep 8:16698, 2018
  • 11) Liu YC et al: Quick sequential organ failure assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Internal and Emerg Med 14:603-615, 2019
  • 12) Fernando SM et al: prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for mortality in patients with suspected infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 168:266-275, 2018
  • 13) Herwanto V et al: Accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score to predict sepsis mortality in 121 studies including 1,716,017 individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor 1:e0043, 2019
  • 14) Lo RSL et al: qSOFA is a poor predictor of short-term mortality in all patients: a systematic review of 410.000 patients. J Clin Med 8:61, 2019
  • 15) Gando S et al: The SIRS criteria have better performance for predicting infection than qSOFA scores in the emergency department. Sci Rep 10:8095, 2020
  • 16) Seymour CW et al: Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:762-774, 2016
  • 17) Waligora G et al: AAEM Position Paper. Rapid systematic review: the appropriate use of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 59:977-983, 2020