アブストラクト
| Title | 緑内障の手術 |
|---|---|
| Subtitle | Summing Up |
| Authors | 岩崎健太郎, 稲谷大 |
| Authors (kana) | |
| Organization | 福井大学医学部医学科眼科学 助教, 福井大学医学部医学科眼科学 教授 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Glaucoma |
| Volume | |
| Number | 64 |
| Page | 101-107 |
| Year/Month | 2022 / 9 |
| Article | 報告 |
| Publisher | メディカルレビュー社 |
| Abstract | 「はじめに」現在行われている緑内障手術の術式は, 大きく分けて濾過手術, 房水流出路再建術, 瞳孔ブロックを解消する手術, 毛様体破壊術の4つに分類される. なかでも, 房水流出路再建術については線維柱帯切開術(トラベクロトミー)が代表的であったが, 近年は低侵襲化と時間短縮を図る手術として低侵襲緑内障手術(minimally invasive glaucoma surgery:MIGS)が主流となっている. MIGSは眼内から線維柱帯にアプローチすることで結膜への侵襲を与えず, 追加の緑内障手術の妨げにならない. また, 手術による合併症が少なく安全性が高い. このような理由から, わが国でも初回手術としてMIGSが適応される症例が劇的に増加し, 現在の緑内障手術の潮流となっている. 本稿では, 各種MIGSについて特徴を紹介する. 表2には, 各種MIGSについての特徴を簡単にまとめた. |
| Practice | 臨床医学：外科系 |
| Keywords |
- 全文ダウンロード： 従量制、基本料金制の方共に913円(税込) です。
参考文献
- 1) 日本緑内障学会緑内障診療ガイドライン改訂委員会. 緑内障診療ガイドライン(第5版). 日眼会誌. 2022;126:85-177.
- 2) Iwasaki K, Arimura S, Takamura Y, et al. Clinical practice preferences for glaucoma surgery in Japan:a survey of Japan Glaucoma Society specialists. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020;64:385-91.
- 3) 厚生労働省. NDBオープンデータ. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177182.html
- 4) Minckler D, Mosaed S, Dustin L, et al. Trabectome(trabeculectomy-internal approach):additional experience and extended follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;106:149-59.
- 5) Ting JL, Damji KF, Stiles MC. Ab interno trabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:315-23.
残りの30件を表示する
- 6) Mizoguchi T, Nishigaki S, Sato T, et al. Clinical results of Trabectome surgery for open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1889-94.
- 7) Shoji N, Kasahara M, Iijima A, et al. Short-term evaluation of Trabectome surgery performed on Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016;60:156-65.
- 8) Parikh HA, Bussel II, Schuman JS, et al. Coarsened Exact Matching of Phaco-Trabectome to Trabectome in Phakic Patients:Lack of Additional Pressure Reduction from Phacoemulsification. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149384.
- 9) Greenwood MD, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, et al. Goniotomy with a single-use dual blade:Short-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:1197-201.
- 10) Berdahl JP, Gallardo MJ, ElMallah MK, et al. Six-Month Outcomes of Goniotomy Performed with the Kahook Dual Blade as a Stand-Alone Glaucoma Procedure. Adv Ther. 2018;35:2093-102.
- 11) Dorairaj SK, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, et al. 12-Month Outcomes of Goniotomy Performed Using the Kahook Dual Blade Combined with Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Medically Treated Glaucoma. Adv Ther. 2018;35:1460-9.
- 12) Iwasaki K, Takamura Y, Orii Y, et al. Performances of glaucoma operations with Kahook Dual Blade or iStent combined with phacoemulsification in Japanese open angle glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13:941-5.
- 13) Al Habash A, Albuainain A. Long term outcome of combined phacoemulsification and excisional goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade in different subtypes of glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10660.
- 14) Sieck EG, Epstein RS, Kennedy JB, et al. Outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy with and without phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1:75-81.
- 15) Tanito M, Sugihara K, Tsutsui A, et al. Midterm results of Microhook ab Interno Trabeculotomy in Initial 560 eyes with Glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2021;10:814.
- 16) Sato T, Kawaji T, Hirata A, et al. 360-degree suture trabeculotomy ab interno to treat open-angle glaucoma:2-year outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:915-23.
- 17) Sato T, Kawaji T. 12-month randomised trial of 360°and 180°Schlemm's canal incisions in suture trabeculotomy ab interno for open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1094-8.
- 18) Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, et al. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:459-67.
- 19) Malvankar-Mehta MS, Iordanous Y, Chen YN, et al. iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract:A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131770.
- 20) Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR Jr, Lubeck DM, et al. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract:Two-Year Results. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:811-21.
- 21) Manning D. Real-world Case Series of iStent or iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents Combined with Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8:549-61.
- 22) Guedes RAP, Gravina DM, Lake JC, et al. One-Year Comparative Evaluation of iStent or iStent inject Implantation Combined with Cataract Surgery in a Single Center. Adv Ther. 2019;36:2797-810.
- 23) Mori S, Tanito M, Shoji N, et al. Non-inferiority of Microhook to trabectome:Trabectome vs. ab interno Microhook Trabeculotomy Comparative Study(Tram Trac Study). Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021. Online ahead of print.
- 24) Aoki R, Hirooka K, Goda E, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and Goniotomy with the Kahook Gual Blade in Combination with Phacoemulsification:A Retrospective, Comparativee Case Series. Adv Ther. 2021;38:329-36.
- 25) Omoto T, Fujishiro T, Asano-Shimizu K, et al. Comparison of 12-month surgical outcomes of ab interno trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification between spatula-shaped and dual-blade microhooks. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021;65:402-8.
- 26) Yokoyama H, Takata M, Gomi F. One-year outcomes of microhook trabeculotomy versus suture trabeculotomy ab interno. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260:215-24.
- 27) Dorairaj SK, Kahook MY, Williamson BK, et al. A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:791-7.
- 28) ElMallah MK, Seibold LK, Kahook MY, et al. 12-Month Retrospective Comparison of Kahook Dual Blade Excisional Goniotomy with Istent Trabecular Bypass Device Implantation Glaucomatous Eyes at the Time of Cataract Surgery. Adv Ther. 2019;36:2515-27.
- 29) Falkenberry S, Singh IP, Crane CJ, et al. Excisional goniotomy vs trabecular microbypass stent implantation:a prospective randomized clinical trial in eyes with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020:46:1165-71.
- 30) Arnljots TS, Economou MA. Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy vs iStent inject:Long-Term Results in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:541-50.
- 31) Riss I, Batlle J, Pinchuk L, et al. One-year results on the safety and efficacy of the InnFocus MicroShunt(TM)depending on placement and concentration of mitomycin C. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015;38:855-60.
- 32) Batlle JF, Fantes F, Riss I, et al. Three-year follow-up of a novel aqueous humor microshunt. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:e58-65.
- 33) Schlenker MB, Durr GM, Michaelov E, et al. Interediate Outcomes of a Novel Standalone Ab Externo SIBS Microshunt with Mitomycin C. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;215:141-53.
- 34) Baker ND, Barnebey HS, Moster MR, et al. Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma:One-Year Results from a 2-year Randomized, Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1710-21.
- 35) Durr GM, Schlenker MB, Samet S, et al. One-year outcomes of stand-alone ab externo SIBS microshunt implantation in refractory glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106:71-9.
