アブストラクト
| Title | 非定型骨折 |
|---|---|
| Subtitle | 特集 整形外科の外傷治療 - 現状と課題 - V. その他のトピックにおける現状と課題 |
| Authors | 王耀東 |
| Authors (kana) | |
| Organization | 東京医科歯科大学大学院医歯学総合研究科整形外傷外科治療開発学講座 |
| Journal | 関節外科 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Number | suppl-1 |
| Page | 134-140 |
| Year/Month | 2020 / 4 |
| Article | 報告 |
| Publisher | メジカルビュー社 |
| Abstract | 「現状と課題」非定型「大腿骨」骨折は, 骨密度増加や脆弱性骨折予防の効果がきわめて高いビスホスホネート製剤の長期使用などにより発症し, 骨癒合が遷延すると長期間の荷重制限を要する場合があるため, 臨床上きわめて重要な疾患である. 国内外で注目され活発に研究されているが, 多因子性疾患であるために複数の病態が混同して議論され, 未だ全容が解明されておらず, 明確な診断基準・治療指針がない. 筆者らは非定型大腿骨骨折の発症高位別特徴に注目し, サブタイプ分類 (Oh分類) を提唱した. 今後の研究でサブタイプ別に発症要因が同定され診断基準が明確になることで, 治療指針が確立し, 病態に即した治療法が選択できる可能性がある. |
| Practice | 臨床医学：外科系 |
| Keywords |
- 全文ダウンロード： 従量制、基本料金制の方共に1,243円(税込) です。
参考文献
- 1) Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, et al. Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 1294-301.
- 2) Schilcher J, Michaelsson K, Aspenberg P. Bisphosphonate use and atypical fractures of the femoral shaft. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1728-37.
- 3) Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 2267-94.
- 4) Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 1-23.
- 5) Bogdan Y. Atypical femur fractures. In: Tornetta III P, Ricci WM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, McKee M(editors). Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 9th ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p2341-55.
残りの25件を表示する
- 6) Mahjoub Z, Jean S, Leclerc JT, et al. Incidence and characteristics of atypical femoral fractures: clinical and geometrical data. J Bone Miner Res 2016; 31: 767-76.
- 7) Oh Y, Wakabayashi Y, Kurosa Y, et al. Stress fracture of the bowed femoral shaft is another cause of atypical femoral fracture in elderly Japanese: a case series. J Orthop Sci 2014; 19: 579-86.
- 8) Hagen JE, Miller AN, Ott SM, et al. Association of atypical femoral fractures with bisphosphonate use by patients with varus hip geometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1905-9.
- 9) Oh Y, Wakabayashi Y, Kurosa Y, et al. Potential pathogenic mechanism for stress fractures of the bowed femoral shaft in the elderly: mechanical analysis by the CT-based finite element method. Injury 2014; 45: 1764-71.
- 10) Oh Y, Fujita K, Wakabayashi Y, et al. Location of atypical femoral fracture can be determined by tensile stress distribution influenced by femoral bowing and neck-shaft angle: a CT-based nonlinear finite element analysis model for the assessment of femoral shaft loading stress. Injury 2017; 48: 2736-43.
- 11) Martelli S, Pivonka P, Ebeling PR. Femoral shaft strains during daily activities: implications for atypical femoral fractures. Clin Biomech 2014; 29: 869-76.
- 12) Haider IT, Schneider P, Michalski A, et al. Influence of geometry on proximal femoral shaft strains: implications for atypical femoral fracture. Bone 2018; 110: 295-303.
- 13) Schilcher J, Howe TS, Png MA, et al. Atypical fractures are mainly subtrochanteric in Singapore and diaphyseal in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30: 2127-32.
- 14) Hagino H, Endo N, Yamamoto T, et al. Treatment status and radiographic features of patients with atypical femoral fractures. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23: 316-20.
- 15) Devas M. Stress fractures of the femur. Stress fractures. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975. p107-29.
- 16) 王 耀東, 大川 淳. CT有限要素法を用いた大腿骨の生体力学解析. 松田秀一編. 別冊整形外科 No75 整形外科診療における最先端技術. 東京: 南江堂; 2019. p117-20.
- 17) 王 耀東, 若林良明, 黒佐義郎, ほか. 非定型大腿骨骨折の発症高位別分類の検証. 骨折 2018; 40: 6-9.
- 18) 王 耀東, 藤田浩二, 若林良明, ほか. 大腿骨頚部骨折を予防すべき非定型大腿骨骨折患者の特徴. 東日本整形災害外科学会雑誌 2018; 30: 48-51.
- 19) Tano A, Oh Y, Fukushima K, et al. Potential bone fragility of mid-shaft atypical femoral fracture: biomechanical analysis by a CT-based nonlinear finite element method. Injury 2019; 50: 1876-82.
- 20) Kim JW, Kim JJ, Byun YS, et al. Factors affecting fracture location in atypical femoral fractures: a cross-sectional study with 147 patients. Injury 2017; 48: 1570-4.
- 21) Schilcher J. High revision rate but good healing capacity of atypical femoral fractures. A comparison with common shaft fractures. Injury 2015; 46: 2468-73.
- 22) Miyakoshi N, Aizawa T, Sasaki S, et al. Healing of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures in patients with osteoporosis: a comparison between treatment with and without teriparatide. J Bone Miner Metab 2015; 33: 553-9.
- 23) Oh Y, Yamamoto K, Hashimoto J, et al. Validation of newly devised subtype classification for atypical femoral fracture. 8th Fragility Fracture Network Global Congress 2019; Book of Abstracts: 52.
- 24) Prasarn ML, Ahn J, Helfet DL, et al. Bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures have high complication rates with operative fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 2295-301.
- 25) Koch JC. The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat 1917; 21: 177-298.
- 26) Cho JW, Oh CW, Leung F, et al. Healing of atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures after cephalomedullary nailing: which factors predict union?. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31: 138-45.
- 27) Leclerc JT, Michou L, Vaillancourt F, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34: 83-92.
- 28) MacKenzie SA, Ng RT, Snowden G, et al. Periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures exist and are associated with duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Bone Joint J 2019; 101: 1285-91.
- 29) Tan SH, Saseendar S, Tan BH, et al. Ulnar fractures with bisphosphonate therapy: a systematic review of published case reports. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26: 421-9.
- 30) Pentecost RL, Murray RA, Brindley HH. Fatigue, insufficiency, and pathologic fractures. JAMA 1964; 187: 1001-4.
