~
検索条件をクリア

アブストラクト

Japanese

Title 痛みの破局的思考が大腿骨近位部骨折術後リハビリテーションへ及ぼす影響
Subtitle 原著
Authors 田中正一
Authors (kana)
Organization 医療法人ちゅうざん会ちゅうざん病院リハビリテーション科
Journal 日本職業・災害医学会会誌
Volume 70
Number 3
Page 72-77
Year/Month 2022 / 5
Article 原著
Publisher 日本職業・災害医学会
Abstract 要旨: 痛みの破局的思考は術後疼痛, リハビリテーションの結果に影響を及ぼすことが報告されている. そのため, 回復期リハビリテーション病棟の大腿骨近位部骨折術後患者において破局的思考がリハビリテーションへ及ぼす影響について調査した. 4年間に入院した大腿骨近位部骨折術後患者212名中58名を対象とした. 痛みの破局的思考はPain Catastrophizing Scale(PCS)で評価し, 患者を入院時PCS 31点以上のPCS高値群7名と30点以下の対照群51名に分類した. Functional Ambulation Category(FAC), 機能的自立度評価法(Functional Independence measure: FIM), 股関節疼痛Numerical Rating Scale(NRS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS)を入院時と退院時に評価し, PCS高値群と対照群を比較した. PCS高値群は対照群に比べ入院時, 退院時ともにNRSとHADS不安が有意に高値(P<0.05)であったが, FAC, FIMとHADS抑うつは入院時, 退院時ともに有意差を認めなかった. リハビリテーションを実施することにより, 痛みの破局的思考が重症な患者でも, 歩行や日常生活活動の結果は対照群と変わらなかったが, 疼痛や不安には影響を認めた. そのため, 痛みの破局的思考が重症と考えられる患者には, 心理的なサポートに基づく介入が必要である.
Practice 臨床医学:外科系
Keywords 大腿骨近位部骨折, 痛みの破局的思考, リハビリテーション, hip fracture, pain catastrophizing, rehabilitation

English

Title The Impact of Pain Catastrophizing on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Hip Fractures
Subtitle
Authors Shoichi Tanaka
Authors (kana)
Organization Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chuzan Hospital
Journal Japanese journal of occupational medicine and traumatology
Volume 70
Number 3
Page 72-77
Year/Month 2022 / 5
Article Original article
Publisher Japanese society of Occupational Medicine and Traumatology
Abstract Pain catastrophizing has been reported to affect postoperative pain and rehabilitation outcomes. Therefore, this study was designed to clarify the impact of pain catastrophizing on rehabilitation of patients after hip fracture surgery in the convalescent rehabilitation ward. The subjects were 58 out of 212 patients after hip fracture surgery who were hospitalized for 4 years. Pain catastrophizing was assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and patients were classified into high PCS group (PCS score >- 31, N = 7) and control group (PCS score <- 30, N = 51) at the admission. Admission and discharge assessments were undertaken: Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), hip pain: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The high PCS group and the control group were compared for those admission and discharge assessments. High PCS group showed significantly higher NRS and HADS anxiety than control group at the time of admission and that of discharge (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in FAC, FIM, and HADS depression between high PCS group and control group at the time of admission and that of discharge. By performing rehabilitation, the results of rehabilitation for walking and activities of daily living were the same as those of the control patients even in patients with severe pain catastrophizing, but their pain and anxiety were affected. Therefore, patients who are considered to be in higher level of pain catastrophizing need an adequate intervention based on psychological support.
Practice Clinical surgery
Keywords hip fracture, pain catastrophizing, rehabilitation
  • 全文ダウンロード: 従量制、基本料金制の方共に770円(税込) です。

参考文献

  • 1) Flanigan DC, Everhart JS, Glassman AH : Psychological factors affecting rehabilitation and outcomes following elective orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23(9) : 563-570, 2015.
  • 2) Holmes J, House A : Psychiatric illness predicts poor out-come after surgery for hip fracture : a prospective cohort study. Psychol Med 30(4) : 921-929, 2000.
  • 3) Alexiou KI, Roushias A, Varitimidis SE, Malizos KN : Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture : a review. Clin Interv Aging 13 : 143-150, 2018.
  • 4) Fregoso G, Wang A, Tseng K, Wang J : Transition from acute to chronic pain : evaluating risk for chronic postsurgi-cal pain. Pain Physician 22 : 479-488, 2019.
  • 5) Goto K, Kataoka II, Honda A, et al : Factors affecting per-sistent postoperative pain in patients with hip fractures. Pain Res Manag 8814290, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8814290.
残りの20件を表示する
  • 6) 水野泰行 : 慢性疼痛と破局化. 心身医 50(12) : 1133-1137.
  • 7) 慢性疼痛治療ガイドライン作成ワーキンググループ : I. 総論, 慢性疼痛治療ガイドライン. 東京, 真興交易医書出版部, 2018, pp16-27.
  • 8) 杉下守弘, 腰塚洋介, 須藤慎治, 他 : MMSE-J(精神状態短時間検査-日本語版)原法の妥当性と信頼性. 認知神経科学 20(2) : 91-110, 2018.
  • 9) Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al : Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 11 : 1-8, 2020.
  • 10) Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D : Measuring balance in the elderly : preliminary develop-ment of an instrument. Physiother Can 41 : 304-311, 1989.
  • 11) Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI : The Balance Scale : reliability assessment with elderly residents and pa-tients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 27 : 27-36, 1995.
  • 12) Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, et al : Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Reha-bil 88(10) : 1314-1319, 2007.
  • 13) McDowell I, Newell C, editors : The Barthel Index, Meas-uring Health, A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd edition. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp56-63.
  • 14) 千野直一編 : 脳卒中患者の機能評価. SIASとFIMの実際. 東京, シュプリンガー・フェアラーク東京, 1997, pp41-96.
  • 15) Koh GC-H, Chen CH, Petrella R, Thind A : Rehabilitation impact indices and their independent predictors : a system-atic review. BMJ Open 3 : e003483, 2013. doi : 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-003483.
  • 16) Linton SJ, Gotestam KG : A clinical comparison of two pain scales : correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance. Pain 17(1) : 57-65, 1983.
  • 17) Williamson A, Hoggart B : Pain : a review of three com-monly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14(7) : 798-804, 2005.
  • 18) 松岡紘史, 坂野雄二 : 痛みの認知面の評価 : Pain Catas-trophizing Scale日本語版の作成と信頼性および妥当性の検討. 心身医 47 : 95-102, 2007.
  • 19) 東あかね, 八城博子, 清田啓介, 他 : 消化器内科外来におけるhospital anxiety and depression scale(HAD尺度)日本語版の信頼性と妥当性の検討. 日消誌 93(12) : 884-892, 1996.
  • 20) Sullivan MJL : The Pain Catastrophizing Scale. User Manual. 2009, pp1-36. http://sullivan-painresearch.mcgill.ca/pdf/pcs/PCSManual_English.pdf.
  • 21) Kanda Y : Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Trans-plantation 48 : 452-458, 2013.
  • 22) Nasiri SM : Chapter 5. Hip Fracture : Anatomy, Causes, and Consequences, Total Hip Replacement-An Overview. 2018, pp 67-82. DOI : 10. 5772/intechopen. 75946(accessed 2021-10-05).
  • 23) Gudmundsson P, Nakonezny PA, Lin J, et al : Functional improvement in hip pathology is related to improvement in anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing : an intri-cate link between physical and mental well-being. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22 : 133, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04001-5.
  • 24) 大島埴生 : 大腿骨転子部骨折後, 痛みに対する破局的思考により回復が遅延した一症例の治療経過. PTジャーナル 53(4) : 411-415, 2019.
  • 25) Craner JR, Sperry JA, Evans MM : The Relationship Be-tween Pain Catastrophizing and Outcomes of a 3-Week Comprehensive Pain Rehabilitation Program. Pain Medi-cine 17 : 2026-2035, 2016.