アブストラクト
Japanese
Title | 小児複雑性虫垂炎における治療法の検討 - 治療成績とinterval appendectomy脱落予測因子を踏まえて - |
---|---|
Subtitle | 原著 |
Authors | 久松千恵子1,2, 辻恵未1, 畠山理1 |
Authors (kana) | |
Organization | 1姫路赤十字病院小児外科, 2現:愛仁会高槻病院小児外科 |
Journal | 日本小児外科学会雑誌 |
Volume | 56 |
Number | 4 |
Page | 370-375 |
Year/Month | 2020 / 8 |
Article | 原著 |
Publisher | 日本小児外科学会 |
Abstract | 「要旨」【目的】小児複雑性虫垂炎のより良い治療法を, interval appendectomy(以下IA)脱落予測因子と治療成績を踏まえて検討した. 【方法】対象は2009年1月〜2018年12月に当院で治療した複雑性虫垂炎144例. 緊急手術群と抗生剤加療先行のIA企図群に分け治療前評価項目を比較した. IA企図群をIA成功群, IA脱落群, IA非実施群に細分し, IA成功群とIA脱落群の比較からIA脱落予測因子を抽出した. 治療成績は緊急手術群, IA成功群, IA脱落群の3群間で比較した. 手術は全例腹腔鏡下で行った. 【結果】緊急手術群104例, IA企図群40例(IA成功群25例, IA脱落群9例, IA非実施群6例). IAは, 下痢があり, CRP高値, 大きな膿瘍形成があり, 診断までに日数を要した症例に選択される傾向にあった(全てp<0.01). 糞石有りの症例は緊急手術を選択する傾向にあった(p=0.006). IA企図の場合, IA脱落群はIA成功群に比べ, 年齢が高く, 虫垂は太く, 糞石を認めたが, 膿瘍は小さい傾向だった(全てp<0.04). IA脱落予測因子は糞石有りと膿瘍最大径の2因子で, 特に糞石有り(オッズ比25.06)は重要な因子となった. 治療成績では. 手術時間はIA成功群が, 総入院日数は緊急手術群が有意に短かった(共にp<0.001). 開腹移行はIA脱落群に多かった(p=0.01). 【結論】複雑性虫垂炎の治療成績では, IAは手術時間が短く, 緊急手術は総入院日数が短い利点があった. しかしながら, 糞石有りの症例はIA企図から脱落する可能性が示唆され, 治療法を選択する上で留意が必要である. |
Practice | 臨床医学:外科系 |
Keywords | 急性虫垂炎, 複雑性虫垂炎, 小児, interval appendectomy, 脱落予測因子, acute appendicitis, complicated appendicitis, children, predictor |
English
Title | Appropriate Treatment for Complicated Appendicitis in Children |
---|---|
Subtitle | Originals |
Authors | Chieko Hisamatsu1,2, Emi Tsuji1, Tadashi Hatakeyama1 |
Authors (kana) | |
Organization | 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, 2Present address:Department of Pediatric Surgery, Takatsuki General Hospital |
Journal | Journal of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons |
Volume | 56 |
Number | 4 |
Page | 370-375 |
Year/Month | 2020 / 8 |
Article | Original article |
Publisher | Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons |
Abstract | Purpose: Although emergent appendectomy (EA) for complicated appendicitis (CA) is straightforward, interval appendectomy (IA) following non-operative management (NOM) is sometimes chosen to treat CA because of exacerbated inflammation. We reviewed our institutional experience of CA cases with a focus on the predictor of NOM failure and the outcome of treatments. Methods: A total of 144 children with CA treated between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All operations were attempted laparoscopically. Results: EA was performed on 104 children (Group EA). The remaining 40 initially underwent NOM: 25 underwent IA successfully (Group IA-S), 9 had failed NOM (Group IA-F), and 6 never underwent surgery. On comparing the pretreatment evaluation of EA with NOM, NOM tended m be chosen for cases involving diarrhea and those with an elevated CRP level, those with a larger abscess, or those that took longer to diagnose (p<0.01 each). On the other hand, EA tended to be chosen for cases involving fecalith (p=0.006). In the NOM group, the presence of fecalith was likely an independently significant predictor of NOM failure (odds ratio 25.06). On the outcome of treatments, Group IA-S had a significantly shorter duration of surgery, and Group EA had a significantly shorter length of hospitalization (p<0.001 each). Group IA-F had the highest rate of conversion to laparotomy (p=0.01). Conclusions: On the outcome of CA treatments, IA had a shorter operative time, and EA had a shorter length of hospitalization. However, considerable attention to the fact that the presence of fecalith will more likely lead to NOM failure is needed for the treatment decision. |
Practice | Clinical surgery |
Keywords | acute appendicitis, complicated appendicitis, children, interval appendectomy, predictor |
- 全文ダウンロード: 従量制、基本料金制の方共に770円(税込) です。
参考文献
- 1) 日本小児救急医学会診療ガイドライン作成委員会編:第II部小児急性虫垂炎診療ガイドライン. エビデンスに基づいた子どもの腹部救急診療ガイドライン2017, 2017.
- 2) Ein SH, Langer JC, Daneman A: Nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendix with inflammatory mass or abscess: Presence of an appendicolith predicts recurrent appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg, 40: 1612-1615, 2005.
- 3) 家入里志, 桝佑典, 松浦俊治, 他:[急性虫垂炎の治療方針の変遷と現状] Interval appendectomyの適応と至適手術時期についての検討. 日腹部救急医会誌, 32: 771-774, 2012.
- 4) Talishinskiy T, Limberg J, Ginsburg H, et al: Factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment of complicated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg, 51: 1174-1176, 2016.
- 5) 棚野晃秀, 堀澤稔:腫瘤形成性虫垂炎に対するinterval appendectomyの限界:Dropout症例の傾向と対策. 日小外会誌, 47: 932-937, 2011.
残りの3件を表示する
- 6) Tanaka Y, Uchida H, Kawashima H, et al: More than one-third of successfully nonoperatively treated patients with complicated appendicitis experienced recurrent appendicitis: Is interval appendectomy necessary? J Pediatr Surg, 51: 1957-1961, 2016.
- 7) Gonzalez DO, Deans KJ, Minneci PC: Role of nonoperative management in pediatric appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg, 25: 204-207, 2016.
- 8) 久松千恵子, 畠山理:小児複雑性虫垂炎における腹腔鏡手術の比較検討. 日内視鏡外会誌, 24: MO220-4, 2019.