アブストラクト
Japanese
Title | 腰部脊柱管狭窄症における腰痛関連因子の解析 |
---|---|
Subtitle | 原著 第49回日本脊椎脊髄病学会優秀論文 |
Authors | 黄金勲矢1, 高島弘幸1,2, 寺島嘉紀1, 吉本三徳1, 竹林庸雄3, 山下敏彦1 |
Authors (kana) | |
Organization | 1札幌医科大学医学部整形外科学講座, 2札幌医科大学附属病院放射線部, 3札幌円山整形外科病院 |
Journal | Journal of Spine Research |
Volume | 13 |
Number | 5 |
Page | 770-777 |
Year/Month | 2022 / |
Article | 原著 |
Publisher | 日本脊椎脊髄病学会 |
Abstract | 「要旨」はじめに: 目的は腰部脊柱管狭窄症における腰痛と関連する因子を解析することである. 対象と方法: 対象は腰部脊柱管狭窄症の患者120例(男性52例, 女性68例, 平均年齢64.1歳)で腰痛visual analogue scale(VAS)が30mmより大きいH群, 30mm以下のL群に分類した. 神経障害型式, VAS(下肢痛, 下肢しびれ), 骨密度, すべり, 脊柱・骨盤アライメント, 椎間板変性, 多裂筋断面積と脂肪浸潤, Modic change, 椎間関節変性を解析した. 結果: H群とL群の平均はそれぞれ, 下肢痛VASが73.3mmと50.3mm, 下肢しびれVASが76.2mmと51.2mm, 腰椎前弯角(lumbar lordosis: LL)が32.6°, 40.4°, sagittal vertical axis(SVA)が54.4mm, 29.2mm, 仙骨傾斜が27.7°, 32.3°, pelvic incidence(PI)-LLが15.9°, 9.6°で有意差を認めた. 多重ロジスティック回帰分析でSVA(調整オッズ比: 1.017, 95%信頼区間: 1.003〜1.031, p<0.05)とPI-LL(調整オッズ比: 1.058, 95%信頼区間: 1.012〜1.152, p<0.05)が有意となった. 結語: 腰部脊柱管狭窄症における腰痛にSVAとPI-LLが有意に関連していた. |
Practice | 臨床医学:外科系 |
Keywords | 腰部脊柱管狭窄症, 腰痛, 脊柱・骨盤アライメント, lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, spinopelvic alignment |
English
Title | Analysis of Factors Related to Low Back Pain in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
---|---|
Subtitle | Original Article |
Authors | Izaya Ogon1, Hiroyuki Takashima1,2, Yoshinori Terashima1, Mitsunori Yoshimoto1, Tsuneo Takebayashi3, Toshihiko Yamashita1 |
Authors (kana) | |
Organization | 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, 2Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, 3Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital |
Journal | Journal of Spine Research |
Volume | 13 |
Number | 5 |
Page | 770-777 |
Year/Month | 2022 / |
Article | Original article |
Publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
Abstract | [Abstract] Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors associated with low back pain (LBP) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: In total, 120 patients with LSS (52 males and 68 females; mean age, 64.1 +- 1.8 years) participated in this study. LBP was defined as pain on the posterior aspect of the trunk between the 12th rib and the lower end of the glenoid groove that lasts for > 3 months. The patients were classified into two groups: high (H) group, which had a LBP visual analog scale (VAS) score > 30 mm, and the low (L) group, which had a LBP VAS score <- 30 mm. The age, gender, body mass index, neurological disorder pattern, bone mineral density, slippage, spinopelvic alignment, disc degeneration, cross sectional area and fatty infiltration of the multifidus muscle, Modic changes, and facet degeneration were compared between the H and L groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with group H and L as dependent variables. Results: In the H and L groups, the mean lower leg pain VAS was 73.3 +- 4.6 mm and 50.3 +- 3.5 mm (p < 0.01), the mean lower leg numbness VAS was 76.2 +- 4.9 mm and 51.2 +- 4.1 mm (p < 0.01), the mean lumbar lordosis (LL) was 32.6 +- 3.0° and 40.4 +- 3.1° (p < 0.01), the mean sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was 54.4 +- 6.6 mm and 29.2 +- 6.2 mm (p < 0.01), the mean sacral slope was 27.7° +- 1.3° and 32.3° +- 1.4° (p < 0.05), and the mean pelvic incidence (PI)-LL was 15.9° +- 0.8° and 9.6° +- 0.7° (p < 0.01), respectively. A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that SVA (OR, 1.017; 95% CI: 1.003 - 1.031, p < 0.05) and PI-LL (OR, 1.058; 95% CI: 1.012 - 1.152, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with LBP. Conclusions: SVA and PI-LL were considered to be associated with LBP in patients with LSS. |
Practice | Clinical surgery |
Keywords | lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, spinopelvic alignment |
- 全文ダウンロード: 従量制、基本料金制の方共に770円(税込) です。
参考文献
- 1) Deyo RA, Weinstein JN : Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001 ; 344 : 363-370
- 2) Suzuki H, Kanchiku T, Imajo Y : Diagnosis and characters of non-specific low back pain in Japan : The Yamaguchi low back pain study. PLoS One. 2016 ; 11 : e0160454
- 3) Katz JN, Harris MB : Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal steno-sis. N Engl J Med. 2008 ; 358 : 818-825
- 4) Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, et al : Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 1995 ; 20 : 1178-1186
- 5) Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ : The visual analogue pain intensity scale : what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997 ; 72 : 95-97
残りの17件を表示する
- 6) Kelly AM : The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with sever-ity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001 ; 18 : 205-207
- 7) Sakeb N, Ahsan K : Comparison of the early results of trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar in-terbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability. Indian J Orthop. 2013 ; 47 : 255-263
- 8) Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al : Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance-how much can you toler-ate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2010 ; 35 : 2224-2231
- 9) Pfirrmann CW, Metzdor fA, Zanetti M, et al : Magnetic reso-nance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degenera-tion. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2001 ; 26 : 1873-1878
- 10) Ogon I, Takebayashi T, Takashima T, et al : Quantitative analysis concerning atrophy and fat infiltration of multifi-dus muscle with magnetic resonance spectroscopy in chronic low back pain. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 ; 3 : 163-179
- 11) Kjaer P, Bendix T, Sorensen JS, et al : Associated with low back pain? BMC Med. 2007 ; 5 : 2
- 12) Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, et al : Degenerative disk disease : assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988 ; 166 : 193-199
- 13) Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D : Osteoarthritis of the facet joints : accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology. 1987 ; 164 : 227-230
- 14) Ogura Y, Shinozaki Y, Kobayashi Y, et al : Impact of decom-pression surgery without fusion forlumbar spinal stenosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment : minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 ; 30 : 743-749
- 15) Gao A, Wang Y, Yu M, et al : Association between radio-graphic spinopelvic parameters and health-related quality of life in de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis and con-comitant lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2020 ; 45 : E1013-E1019
- 16) Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Kasukawa Y, et al : Prevalence, spi-nal alignment, and mobility of lumbar spinal stenosis with or without chronic low back pain : a community-dwelling study. Pain Res Treat. 2011 ; 2011 : 340629
- 17) Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, et al : Epidural pres-sure measurements. Relationship between epidural pres-sure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 1995 ; 20 : 650-653
- 18) Suzuki H, Endo K, Kobayashi H, et al : Total sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar canal stenosis accompa-nied by intermittent claudication. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2010 ; 35 : E344-E346
- 19) Matsuoka H, Komagata M, Nishiyama M, et al : Radio-graphic assessment of sagittal spinal alignment to correlate standards classified by age and low back pain. J Tokyo Med Univ. 2004 ; 62 : 64-71
- 20) Fujii K, Kawamura N, Ikegami M, et al : Radiological im-provements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar de-compression without fusion. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2015 ; 40 : 703-709
- 21) Hikata T, Watanabe K, Fujita N, et al : Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decom-pression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 ; 23 : 451-458
- 22) Baron R, Binder A, Attal N, et al : Neuropathic low back pain in clinical practice. Eur J Pain. 2016 ; 20 : 861-873